阅读综合辅导 　　[法律类] 　　题目序号 　　题型归类 　　第1题 　　指代词题型 　　第2题 　　标点符号题型 　　第3题 　　归纳推导题型 　　第4题 　　细节推导题型 　　第5题 　　细节推导题型 　　Defenders of special protective labor legislation for women oftenmaintain that eliminating such laws would destroy the fruits of a century-longstruggle for the protection of women workers. Even a brief examination of thehistoric practice of courts and employers would show that the fruit of suchlaws has been bitter: they are, in practice, more of a curse than a blessing. 　　Sex-defined protective laws have often been based on stereotypicalassumptions concerning womens needs and abilities and employers have frequently used them aslegal excuses for discriminating against women. After the Second World War, forexample, businesses and government sought to persuade women to vacate jobs infactories, thus making room in the labor force for returning veterans. Therevival or passage of state laws limiting the daily or weekly work hours ofwomen conveniently accomplished this. Employers had only to declare thatovertime hours were a necessary condition of employment or promotion in theirfactory, and women could be quite legally fired, refused jobs, or kept at lowwage levels, all in the name of protecting their health. By validating such laws when they are challenged bylawsuits, the courts have colluded over the years in establishing different,less advantageous employment terms for women than for men, thus reducing womenscompetitiveness on the job market. At the same time, even the mostwell-intentioned lawmakers, courts, and employers have often been blind to thereal needs of women. The lawmakers and the courts continue to permit employersto offer employee health insurance plans that cover all known human medicaldisabilities except those relating to pregnancy and childbirth. 　　Finally, labor laws protecting only special groups are oftenineffective at protecting the workers who are actually in the workplace. Somechemicals, for example, pose reproductive risks for women of childbearingyears: manufacturers using the chemicals comply with laws protecting womenagainst these hazards by refusing to hire them. Thus the sex-definedlegislation protects the hypothetical female worker, but has no effect whateveron the safety of any actual employee. The health risks to male employees insuch industries cannot be negligible, since chemicals toxic enough to causebirth defects in fetuses or sterility in women are presumably harmful to thehuman metabolism. Protective laws aimed at changing production materials ortechniques in order to reduce such hazards would benefit all employees withoutdiscriminating against any. 　　In sum, protective labor laws for women are discriminatory and donot meet their intended purpose. Legislators should recognize that women are inthe work force to stay and that their needs good health care, adecent wage, and a safe workplace are the needs ofall workers. Laws that ignore these facts violate womens rights forequal protection in employment. 　　1.According to the author, which of the following resulted from thepassage or revival of state laws limiting the work hours of women workers? 　　[A] Women workers were compelled to leave their jobs in factories. 　　[B] Many employers had difficulty in providing jobs for returningveterans. 　　[C] Many employers found it hard to attract women workers. 　　[D] The health of most women factory workers improved. 　　2.The author places the word protecting inquotation marks in line 9, paragraph 2 most likely in order to suggest that 　　[A] she is quoting the actual wording of the laws in question. 　　[B] the protective nature of the laws in question should not beoverlooked. 　　[C] protecting the health of workers is important to those whosupport protective labor laws. 　　[D] the laws in question were really used to the detriment of womenworkers, despite being overtly protective in intent. 　　3.The text suggests that which of the following is a shortcoming ofprotective labor laws that single out a particular group of workers forprotection? 　　[A] Such laws are often too weak to be effective at protecting thegroup in question. 　　[B] Such laws are usually drafted by legislators who do not have thebest interests of workers at heart. 　　[C] Such laws exert no pressure on employers to eliminate hazards inthe workplace. 　　[D] Compliance with such laws is often costly for employers andprovokes lawsuits by employees claiming discrimination. 　　4.According to the first paragraph of the text, the author considerswhich of the following to be most helpful in determining the value of specialprotective labor legislation for women? 　　[A] A comparative study of patterns of work-related illnesses instates that had such laws and in states that did not. 　　[B] An estimate of how many women workers are in favor of such laws. 　　[C] An analysis of the cost to employers of complying with suchlaws. 　　[D] A study of the actual effects that such laws have had in thepast on women workers. 　　5.The author implies that which of the following is characteristicof many employee health insurance plans? 　　[A] They cover all the common medical conditions affecting men, butonly some of those affecting women. 　　[B] They lack the special provisions for women workers that proposedspecial labor laws for women would provide. 　　[C] They pay the medical costs associated with pregnancy andchildbirth only for the spouses of male employees, not for female employees. 　　[D] They meet minimum legal requirements, but do not adequatelysafeguard the health of either male or female employees. 　　[答案与考点解析] 　　1.【答案】A 　　【考点解析】这是一道指代词题型。考生可根据题干中的the passage or revival of state laws limiting the work hours ofwomen workers将本题迅速定位在第二段的第三句，该句中的指代词this暗示本题的正确答案应该在第二段的第二句。这样就可以找出本题的正确答案A?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ⒁庵复省? 　　2.【答案】D 　　【考点解析】本题是一道标点符号题。英语作为一种语文，标点符号是非常重要的。在原文中protecting一词被打上引号，其含义是所谓的保护，作者所表达的真实含义是没有起到?；ぷ饔玫谋；?。由此可见本题的正确答案应该是D?？忌诮馓馐币厥颖甑惴?，尤其是一些特殊的标点符号。 　　3.【答案】C 　　【考点解析】本题是一道归纳推导题型。考生可根据题干中的protective labor laws that single out a particular group of workersfor protection将本题的答案信息迅速确定在第三段的第一句，从第三段的内容（尤其是第三段的首尾两句）判断本题的正确答案应该是C?？忌诮馓馐笔紫纫弑干筇舛ㄎ坏哪芰?，然后要善于归纳和总结段落的细节信息。 　　4.【答案】D 　　【考点解析】这是一道细节推导题。本题的题干以将本题的答案信息来源确定在第一段，第一段的第二句是本题正确答案D的准确信息来源也是全文的中心主旨句?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ笔崩渭侨牡闹行闹髦季洌绕涫窃诿允Ы馓馑悸肥?。 　　5.【答案】A 　　【考点解析】这是一道细节推导题。根据本题题干中的employee health insurance plans可将本题的答案信息来源迅速确定在第二段的尾句，从第二段尾句的内容可判断本题的正确答案应该是A?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ焉筇舛ㄎ环旁诘谝晃?。 　　[参考译文] 　　妇女劳动特别保护法的辩护者经常坚持认为，废除这种法律就会破坏一个世纪以来为?；じ九と硕氛某晒?。但是，只要对法庭案例和雇主的历史作短暂回顾，就能够发现这些法律的成果是多么的令人不愉快：实际上，这种法律与其说是一件好事，不如说是一种灾祸。 　　以性别为界限的?；ば苑赏ǔＪ歉萦泄馗九男枰湍芰Φ某赂约傧胛〉模夜椭饕簿Ｊ褂谜庑┓勺魑瞧缡痈九暮戏ń杩?。例如，第二次世界大战之后，企业和政府都企图说服妇女离开她们的工厂中的工作，从而为回国的老兵们在劳动力市场中空出位子。恢复或通过限制妇女每天或每周工作时间的州法律，很容易地就实现了上述的目标。雇主只需声称超时加班是在他们的工厂进行工作或提升的必要条件，这样妇女就被合法地解雇，被拒绝给予工作或者保持一种较低的工资水平，所有这些都以保护妇女健康的名义得以实现。当受到法律诉讼时，法庭在过去数年中一直与雇主合谋共同建立一种男女不同的，对妇女更为不利的雇佣条件，从而降低了妇女在就业市场上的竞争力。同时，即使那些最善意的立法者、法庭和雇主也经常对妇女的真实需求视而不见。法律制定者和法庭都继续允许雇主向雇员提供这样的健康保险计划，它包含了所有已知的人类疾病，但却未包括那些与怀孕和生育相关的医疗内容。 　　最后，那些只保护特殊群体的劳动法在保护实际工作中的工人方面经常是无效的。例如，某些化学物质会对怀孕期间的妇女造成生育上的危险。使用这些化学物品的制造商们就会遵守?；じ九苊庹庑┪Ｏ盏姆啥芫陀端?。因此这种特别界定的法律?；ち思偕柚械母九と?，但对工人实际的任何安全问题都没有作用。在这些工厂中，对男性工人健康的危险也不能被忽略，既然那些化学毒素能导致胎儿的生育缺陷或使妇女不育，那么推而广之，其必然会对人类的新陈代谢有害。目的在于减少这种危险的保护性法律，会改变生产原料或生产技术，从而给所有雇员带来好处，而又不歧视任何一类雇员。 　　总而言之，为妇女制定的劳动?；しㄊ谴衅缡有缘?，而且并没达到它们预期的目的。立法者应该认识到，妇女是劳动力的一部分，而且她们的需求（如良好的健康保健，体面的工资收入，以及安全的工作环境）同时也是所有工人的需求。那些忽略这些事实的法律就会破坏妇女在就业中享受平等?；さ娜ɡ?。

　　阅读综合辅导 　　[法律类] 　　题目序号 　　题型归类 　　第1题 　　指代词题型 　　第2题 　　标点符号题型 　　第3题 　　归纳推导题型 　　第4题 　　细节推导题型 　　第5题 　　细节推导题型 　　Defenders of special protective labor legislation for women oftenmaintain that eliminating such laws would destroy the fruits of a century-longstruggle for the protection of women workers. Even a brief examination of thehistoric practice of courts and employers would show that the fruit of suchlaws has been bitter: they are, in practice, more of a curse than a blessing. 　　Sex-defined protective laws have often been based on stereotypicalassumptions concerning womens needs and abilities and employers have frequently used them aslegal excuses for discriminating against women. After the Second World War, forexample, businesses and government sought to persuade women to vacate jobs infactories, thus making room in the labor force for returning veterans. Therevival or passage of state laws limiting the daily or weekly work hours ofwomen conveniently accomplished this. Employers had only to declare thatovertime hours were a necessary condition of employment or promotion in theirfactory, and women could be quite legally fired, refused jobs, or kept at lowwage levels, all in the name of protecting their health. By validating such laws when they are challenged bylawsuits, the courts have colluded over the years in establishing different,less advantageous employment terms for women than for men, thus reducing womenscompetitiveness on the job market. At the same time, even the mostwell-intentioned lawmakers, courts, and employers have often been blind to thereal needs of women. The lawmakers and the courts continue to permit employersto offer employee health insurance plans that cover all known human medicaldisabilities except those relating to pregnancy and childbirth. 　　Finally, labor laws protecting only special groups are oftenineffective at protecting the workers who are actually in the workplace. Somechemicals, for example, pose reproductive risks for women of childbearingyears: manufacturers using the chemicals comply with laws protecting womenagainst these hazards by refusing to hire them. Thus the sex-definedlegislation protects the hypothetical female worker, but has no effect whateveron the safety of any actual employee. The health risks to male employees insuch industries cannot be negligible, since chemicals toxic enough to causebirth defects in fetuses or sterility in women are presumably harmful to thehuman metabolism. Protective laws aimed at changing production materials ortechniques in order to reduce such hazards would benefit all employees withoutdiscriminating against any. 　　In sum, protective labor laws for women are discriminatory and donot meet their intended purpose. Legislators should recognize that women are inthe work force to stay and that their needs good health care, adecent wage, and a safe workplace are the needs ofall workers. Laws that ignore these facts violate womens rights forequal protection in employment. 　　1.According to the author, which of the following resulted from thepassage or revival of state laws limiting the work hours of women workers? 　　[A] Women workers were compelled to leave their jobs in factories. 　　[B] Many employers had difficulty in providing jobs for returningveterans. 　　[C] Many employers found it hard to attract women workers. 　　[D] The health of most women factory workers improved. 　　2.The author places the word protecting inquotation marks in line 9, paragraph 2 most likely in order to suggest that 　　[A] she is quoting the actual wording of the laws in question. 　　[B] the protective nature of the laws in question should not beoverlooked. 　　[C] protecting the health of workers is important to those whosupport protective labor laws. 　　[D] the laws in question were really used to the detriment of womenworkers, despite being overtly protective in intent. 　　3.The text suggests that which of the following is a shortcoming ofprotective labor laws that single out a particular group of workers forprotection? 　　[A] Such laws are often too weak to be effective at protecting thegroup in question. 　　[B] Such laws are usually drafted by legislators who do not have thebest interests of workers at heart. 　　[C] Such laws exert no pressure on employers to eliminate hazards inthe workplace. 　　[D] Compliance with such laws is often costly for employers andprovokes lawsuits by employees claiming discrimination. 　　4.According to the first paragraph of the text, the author considerswhich of the following to be most helpful in determining the value of specialprotective labor legislation for women? 　　[A] A comparative study of patterns of work-related illnesses instates that had such laws and in states that did not. 　　[B] An estimate of how many women workers are in favor of such laws. 　　[C] An analysis of the cost to employers of complying with suchlaws. 　　[D] A study of the actual effects that such laws have had in thepast on women workers. 　　5.The author implies that which of the following is characteristicof many employee health insurance plans? 　　[A] They cover all the common medical conditions affecting men, butonly some of those affecting women. 　　[B] They lack the special provisions for women workers that proposedspecial labor laws for women would provide. 　　[C] They pay the medical costs associated with pregnancy andchildbirth only for the spouses of male employees, not for female employees. 　　[D] They meet minimum legal requirements, but do not adequatelysafeguard the health of either male or female employees. 　　[答案与考点解析] 　　1.【答案】A 　　【考点解析】这是一道指代词题型?？忌筛萏飧芍械膖he passage or revival of state laws limiting the work hours ofwomen workers将本题迅速定位在第二段的第三句，该句中的指代词this暗示本题的正确答案应该在第二段的第二句。这样就可以找出本题的正确答案A?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ⒁庵复?。 　　2.【答案】D 　　【考点解析】本题是一道标点符号题。英语作为一种语文，标点符号是非常重要的。在原文中protecting一词被打上引号，其含义是所谓的?；ぃ髡咚泶锏恼媸岛迨敲挥衅鸬奖；ぷ饔玫谋；?。由此可见本题的正确答案应该是D?？忌诮馓馐币厥颖甑惴?，尤其是一些特殊的标点符号。 　　3.【答案】C 　　【考点解析】本题是一道归纳推导题型。考生可根据题干中的protective labor laws that single out a particular group of workersfor protection将本题的答案信息迅速确定在第三段的第一句，从第三段的内容（尤其是第三段的首尾两句）判断本题的正确答案应该是C?？忌诮馓馐笔紫纫弑干筇舛ㄎ坏哪芰?，然后要善于归纳和总结段落的细节信息。 　　4.【答案】D 　　【考点解析】这是一道细节推导题。本题的题干以将本题的答案信息来源确定在第一段，第一段的第二句是本题正确答案D的准确信息来源也是全文的中心主旨句?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ笔崩渭侨牡闹行闹髦季?，尤其是在迷失解题思路时。 　　5.【答案】A 　　【考点解析】这是一道细节推导题。根据本题题干中的employee health insurance plans可将本题的答案信息来源迅速确定在第二段的尾句，从第二段尾句的内容可判断本题的正确答案应该是A?？忌诮馓馐币欢ㄒ焉筇舛ㄎ环旁诘谝晃?。 　　[参考译文] 　　妇女劳动特别保护法的辩护者经常坚持认为，废除这种法律就会破坏一个世纪以来为?；じ九と硕氛某晒?。但是，只要对法庭案例和雇主的历史作短暂回顾，就能够发现这些法律的成果是多么的令人不愉快：实际上，这种法律与其说是一件好事，不如说是一种灾祸。 　　以性别为界限的?；ば苑赏ǔＪ歉萦泄馗九男枰湍芰Φ某赂约傧胛〉模夜椭饕簿Ｊ褂谜庑┓勺魑瞧缡痈九暮戏ń杩?。例如，第二次世界大战之后，企业和政府都企图说服妇女离开她们的工厂中的工作，从而为回国的老兵们在劳动力市场中空出位子。恢复或通过限制妇女每天或每周工作时间的州法律，很容易地就实现了上述的目标。雇主只需声称超时加班是在他们的工厂进行工作或提升的必要条件，这样妇女就被合法地解雇，被拒绝给予工作或者保持一种较低的工资水平，所有这些都以?；じ九】档拿宓靡允迪?。当受到法律诉讼时，法庭在过去数年中一直与雇主合谋共同建立一种男女不同的，对妇女更为不利的雇佣条件，从而降低了妇女在就业市场上的竞争力。同时，即使那些最善意的立法者、法庭和雇主也经常对妇女的真实需求视而不见。法律制定者和法庭都继续允许雇主向雇员提供这样的健康保险计划，它包含了所有已知的人类疾病，但却未包括那些与怀孕和生育相关的医疗内容。 　　最后，那些只保护特殊群体的劳动法在?；な导使ぷ髦械墓と朔矫婢Ｊ俏扌У摹＠?，某些化学物质会对怀孕期间的妇女造成生育上的危险。使用这些化学物品的制造商们就会遵守?；じ九苊庹庑┪Ｏ盏姆啥芫陀端?。因此这种特别界定的法律保护了假设中的妇女工人，但对工人实际的任何安全问题都没有作用。在这些工厂中，对男性工人健康的危险也不能被忽略，既然那些化学毒素能导致胎儿的生育缺陷或使妇女不育，那么推而广之，其必然会对人类的新陈代谢有害。目的在于减少这种危险的?；ば苑桑岣谋渖匣蛏际?，从而给所有雇员带来好处，而又不歧视任何一类雇员。 　　总而言之，为妇女制定的劳动保护法是带有歧视性的，而且并没达到它们预期的目的。立法者应该认识到，妇女是劳动力的一部分，而且她们的需求（如良好的健康保健，体面的工资收入，以及安全的工作环境）同时也是所有工人的需求。那些忽略这些事实的法律就会破坏妇女在就业中享受平等保护的权利。