曰韩免费_91久久精品国产亚洲_一区二区成人影院_九一视频在线免费观看_91国视频_亚洲成人中文在线

Streetgangs

雕龙文库 分享 时间: 收藏本文

Streetgangs

  2023年阅读精选:street gangs   The image was riveting, as justice John Paul Stevens, a Chicago native, presented it. A gang member and his father are hanging out near Wrigley Field. Are they there to rob an unsuspecting fan or just to get a glimpse of Sammy Sosa leaving the ball park? A police officer has no idea, but under Chicago s anti-gang law, the cop must order them to disperse. With Stevens writing for a 6-to-3 majority, the Supreme Court last week struck down Chicago s sweeping statute, which had sparked 42,000 arrests in its three years of enforcement.   The decision was a blow to advocates of get-tough crime policies. But in a widely noted concurring opinion, Justice Sandra Day O Connor suggested that a less draconian approach--distinguishing gang members from innocent bystanders--might pass constitutional muster. New language could target loiterers with no apparent purpose other than to establish control over identifiable areas, to intimidate others from entering those areas or to conceal illegal activities, she wrote. Chicago officials vowed to draft a new measure. We will go back and correct it and then move forward, said Mayor Richard Daley.   Chicago officials, along with the League of Cities and 31 states that sided with them in court, might do well to look at one state where anti-gang loitering prosecutions have withstood constitutional challenges: California. The state has two antiloitering statutes on the books, aimed at people intending to commit specific crimes--prostitution and drug dealing. In addition, a number of local prosecutors are waging war against gangs by an innovative use of the public-nuisance laws.   In cities such as Los Angeles and San Jose, prosecutors have sought injunctions against groups of people suspected of gang activity. The officers in the streets know the gang members and gather physical evidence for lengthy court hearings, says Los Angeles prosecutor Martin Vranicar. If the evidence is enough to convince a judge, an injunction is issued to prohibit specific behavior--such as carrying cell phones or pagers or blocking sidewalk passage--in defined geographical areas. It works instantly, says San Jose city attorney Joan Gallo, who successfully defended the tactic before the California Supreme Court. A few days after the injunctions, children are playing on streets where they never were before.   So far, only a few hundred gang members have been targeted, out of an estimated 150,000 in Los Angeles alone. But experts say last week s decision set the parameters for sharper measures. Says Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe: It just means they have to use a scalpel rather than an invisible mallet.   1. What does the author mean by It just means they have to use a scalpel rather than an invisible mallet ?   [A]The gang members should be given a get-tough attitude in the long run.   [B]The targeted gang members rather than all of them should be given a get-tough treatment.   [C] A scalpel can cut off the tumors of the society while the invisible mallet fails to.   [D]A scalpel is more powerful than the invisible mallet.   2. What can we infer from the first two paragraphs?   [A]Chicago s antiloitering law shouldn t be struck down.   [B]The cop was entitled to send the gangs away.   [C]Chicago officials yielded to the result of striking down the law.   [D]antiloitering law in Chicago was much too severe for the majority.   3. The third and fourth paragraphs suggest that ________.   [A]the League of Cities and 31 states should work with Chicago officials   [B]the injunctions in some cities brought back the safety on the street   [C]California successfully starts the battle against the gangs   [D]the police officers shoulder more responsibility than before   4. What does the author intend to illustrate with the example of the gang member and his father?   [A]How the antiloitering law works.   [B]How to maintain charming image.   [C]How tough the crime polices were.   [D]Why Chicago s sweeping statute stroke down 5. Which of the following is true according to the text?   [A]Chicago s sweeping statute was struck down for its involving too many arrests.   [B]Chicago officials still maintained their get-tough crime policies.   [C]It was not safe for children to play on the street.   [D]California used a scalpel while other states used an invisible mallet to cope with the gangs.   参考答案: BDCAD

  

  2023年阅读精选:street gangs   The image was riveting, as justice John Paul Stevens, a Chicago native, presented it. A gang member and his father are hanging out near Wrigley Field. Are they there to rob an unsuspecting fan or just to get a glimpse of Sammy Sosa leaving the ball park? A police officer has no idea, but under Chicago s anti-gang law, the cop must order them to disperse. With Stevens writing for a 6-to-3 majority, the Supreme Court last week struck down Chicago s sweeping statute, which had sparked 42,000 arrests in its three years of enforcement.   The decision was a blow to advocates of get-tough crime policies. But in a widely noted concurring opinion, Justice Sandra Day O Connor suggested that a less draconian approach--distinguishing gang members from innocent bystanders--might pass constitutional muster. New language could target loiterers with no apparent purpose other than to establish control over identifiable areas, to intimidate others from entering those areas or to conceal illegal activities, she wrote. Chicago officials vowed to draft a new measure. We will go back and correct it and then move forward, said Mayor Richard Daley.   Chicago officials, along with the League of Cities and 31 states that sided with them in court, might do well to look at one state where anti-gang loitering prosecutions have withstood constitutional challenges: California. The state has two antiloitering statutes on the books, aimed at people intending to commit specific crimes--prostitution and drug dealing. In addition, a number of local prosecutors are waging war against gangs by an innovative use of the public-nuisance laws.   In cities such as Los Angeles and San Jose, prosecutors have sought injunctions against groups of people suspected of gang activity. The officers in the streets know the gang members and gather physical evidence for lengthy court hearings, says Los Angeles prosecutor Martin Vranicar. If the evidence is enough to convince a judge, an injunction is issued to prohibit specific behavior--such as carrying cell phones or pagers or blocking sidewalk passage--in defined geographical areas. It works instantly, says San Jose city attorney Joan Gallo, who successfully defended the tactic before the California Supreme Court. A few days after the injunctions, children are playing on streets where they never were before.   So far, only a few hundred gang members have been targeted, out of an estimated 150,000 in Los Angeles alone. But experts say last week s decision set the parameters for sharper measures. Says Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe: It just means they have to use a scalpel rather than an invisible mallet.   1. What does the author mean by It just means they have to use a scalpel rather than an invisible mallet ?   [A]The gang members should be given a get-tough attitude in the long run.   [B]The targeted gang members rather than all of them should be given a get-tough treatment.   [C] A scalpel can cut off the tumors of the society while the invisible mallet fails to.   [D]A scalpel is more powerful than the invisible mallet.   2. What can we infer from the first two paragraphs?   [A]Chicago s antiloitering law shouldn t be struck down.   [B]The cop was entitled to send the gangs away.   [C]Chicago officials yielded to the result of striking down the law.   [D]antiloitering law in Chicago was much too severe for the majority.   3. The third and fourth paragraphs suggest that ________.   [A]the League of Cities and 31 states should work with Chicago officials   [B]the injunctions in some cities brought back the safety on the street   [C]California successfully starts the battle against the gangs   [D]the police officers shoulder more responsibility than before   4. What does the author intend to illustrate with the example of the gang member and his father?   [A]How the antiloitering law works.   [B]How to maintain charming image.   [C]How tough the crime polices were.   [D]Why Chicago s sweeping statute stroke down 5. Which of the following is true according to the text?   [A]Chicago s sweeping statute was struck down for its involving too many arrests.   [B]Chicago officials still maintained their get-tough crime policies.   [C]It was not safe for children to play on the street.   [D]California used a scalpel while other states used an invisible mallet to cope with the gangs.   参考答案: BDCAD

  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日日摸夜夜添欧美一区 | 成在线人免费无码高潮喷水 | 青青青国产精品手机在线观看 | 久久精品人妻无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲图片综合 | 午夜精品久久久久久久四虎 | 国产精品久久九九 | 蜜桃影片在线播放网站免费观看 | 18国产精品白浆在线观看免费 | 国产精品爱久久久久久久 | 高h喷水荡肉爽文np肉色学校 | 性色aⅴ在线观看swag | 婷婷四虎东京热无码群交双飞视频 | 日本亚洲欧洲无免费码在线 | 无遮挡1000部拍拍拍欧美劲爆 | 国产高清一区二区三区视频 | 91麻豆福利| 久久久久99精品成人片三人毛片 | 亚洲综合伊人久久大杳蕉 | 天天天天躁天天爱天天碰2018 | 国内精品免费一区二区观看 | 国产粗大猛烈18p | av色欲无码人妻中文字幕 | 国产成人精选免费视频 | 一级一片一a一片 | 一级片在线观看 | 国产成人精品免费久久久久 | 成 人 亚洲 综合天堂 | 少妇高潮毛片免费看 | 无码国产成人午夜电影在线观看 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美综合久久 | 无码免费一区二区三区免费播放 | 国产美女露脸口爆吞精 | 成人午夜视频精品一区 | 国产一级淫片免费播放 | 欧美精品国产综合久久 | a级黄色毛片视频 | 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区 | 欧美激情一区二区三区 | 99久久这里只精品国产免费 | 欧美日韩国产在线一区 |