曰韩免费_91久久精品国产亚洲_一区二区成人影院_九一视频在线免费观看_91国视频_亚洲成人中文在线

GRE写作话题:质疑精神

雕龙文库 分享 时间: 收藏本文

GRE写作话题:质疑精神

  编辑点评: 质疑精神是GRE写作的重要话题。积累相关的知识与词汇,对考生的写作大有裨益。本文为大家介绍三大类质疑精神。

  Skepticism refers to the philosophic position holding that the possibility of knowledge is limited either because of the limitations of the mind or because of the inaccessibility of its object. It is more loosely used to denote any questioning attitude. Extreme skepticism holds that no knowledge is possible, but this is logically untenable since the statement contradicts itself. During the Renaissance the influence of ancient skepticism was reflected preeminently in the writings of the 16th-century French philosophical essayist Michel de Montaigne. The greatest exponent of modern skepticism was the 18th-century Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume. In his Treatise of Human Nature and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , Hume questions the possibility of demonstrating the truth of beliefs about the external world, causal connections, future events, or such metaphysical entities as the soul and God.

  The 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, while attempting to overcome Hume s skepticism, denied the possibility of knowing things in themselves or of achieving metaphysical knowledge. In the 19th century, the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche denied the possibility of complete objectivity, and thus of objective knowledge, in any field. The 20th-century American philosopher George Santayana, claiming to have taken Hume s skepticism a step further, maintained, in his work Scepticism and Animal Faith , that belief in the existence of anything, including oneself, rests on a natural, but irrational impulse. Elements of skepticism may be found in other modern schools of philosophy, including pragmatism, analytic and linguistic philosophy, and existentialism.

  Philosophical skepticism

  In philosophical skepticism, pyrrhonism is a position that refrains from making truth claims. A philosophical skeptic does not claim that truth is impossible . The label is commonly used to describe other philosophies which appear similar to philosophical skepticism, such as academic skepticism, an ancient variant of Platonism that claimed knowledge of truth was impossible. Empiricism is a closely related, but not identical, position to philosophical skepticism. Empiricists see empiricism as a pragmatic compromise between philosophical skepticism and nomothetic science; philosophical skepticism is in turn sometimes referred to as radical empiricism.

  Philosophical skepticism originated in ancient Greek philosophy. One of its first proponents was Pyrrho of Elis , who traveled and studied as far as India, and propounded the adoption of practical skepticism. Subsequently, in the New Academy Arcesilaos and Carneades developed more theoretical perspectives, by which conceptions of absolute truth and falsity were refuted. Carneades criticized the views of the Dogmatists, especially supporters of Stoicism, asserting that absolute certainty of knowledge is impossible. Sextus Empiricus , the main authority for Greek skepticism, developed the position further, incorporating aspects of empiricism into the basis for asserting knowledge.

  Greek skeptics criticized the Stoics, accusing them of dogmatism. For the skeptics, the logical mode of argument was untenable, as it relied on propositions which could not be said to be either true or false without relying on further propositions. This was the regress argument, whereby every proposition must rely on other propositions in order to maintain its validity. In addition, the skeptics argued that two propositions could not rely on each other, as this would create a circular argument . For the skeptics such logic was thus an inadequate measure of truth which could create as many problems as it claimed to have solved. Truth was not, however, necessarily unobtainable, but rather an idea which did not yet exist in a pure form. Although skepticism was accused of denying the possibility of truth, in actual fact it appears to have mainly been a critical school which merely claimed that logicians had not discovered truth.

  Scientific skepticism

  A scientific skeptic is one who questions the reliability of certain kinds of claims by subjecting them to a systematic investigation. The scientific method details the specific process by which this investigation of reality is conducted. Considering the rigor of the scientific method, science itself may simply be thought of as an organized form skepticism. This does not mean that the scientific skeptic is necessarily a scientist who conducts live experiments , but that the skeptic generally accepts claims that are in his/her view likely to be true based on testable hypotheses and critical thinking.

  Common topics that scientifically-skeptical literature questions include health claims surrounding certain foods, procedures, and medicines, such as homeopathy, Reiki, Thought Field Therapy , vertebral subluxations; the plausibility of supernatural entities ; as well as the existence of ESP/telekinesis, psychic powers, and telepathy ; topics in cryptozoology, Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, UFOs, crop circles, astrology, repressed memories, creationism, dowsing, conspiracy theories, and other claims the skeptic sees as unlikely to be true on scientific grounds.

  Most empirical or scientific skeptics do not profess philosophical skepticism. Whereas a philosophical skeptic may deny the very existence of knowledge, an empirical skeptic merely seeks likely proof before accepting that knowledge.

  

  编辑点评: 质疑精神是GRE写作的重要话题。积累相关的知识与词汇,对考生的写作大有裨益。本文为大家介绍三大类质疑精神。

  Skepticism refers to the philosophic position holding that the possibility of knowledge is limited either because of the limitations of the mind or because of the inaccessibility of its object. It is more loosely used to denote any questioning attitude. Extreme skepticism holds that no knowledge is possible, but this is logically untenable since the statement contradicts itself. During the Renaissance the influence of ancient skepticism was reflected preeminently in the writings of the 16th-century French philosophical essayist Michel de Montaigne. The greatest exponent of modern skepticism was the 18th-century Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume. In his Treatise of Human Nature and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding , Hume questions the possibility of demonstrating the truth of beliefs about the external world, causal connections, future events, or such metaphysical entities as the soul and God.

  The 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, while attempting to overcome Hume s skepticism, denied the possibility of knowing things in themselves or of achieving metaphysical knowledge. In the 19th century, the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche denied the possibility of complete objectivity, and thus of objective knowledge, in any field. The 20th-century American philosopher George Santayana, claiming to have taken Hume s skepticism a step further, maintained, in his work Scepticism and Animal Faith , that belief in the existence of anything, including oneself, rests on a natural, but irrational impulse. Elements of skepticism may be found in other modern schools of philosophy, including pragmatism, analytic and linguistic philosophy, and existentialism.

  Philosophical skepticism

  In philosophical skepticism, pyrrhonism is a position that refrains from making truth claims. A philosophical skeptic does not claim that truth is impossible . The label is commonly used to describe other philosophies which appear similar to philosophical skepticism, such as academic skepticism, an ancient variant of Platonism that claimed knowledge of truth was impossible. Empiricism is a closely related, but not identical, position to philosophical skepticism. Empiricists see empiricism as a pragmatic compromise between philosophical skepticism and nomothetic science; philosophical skepticism is in turn sometimes referred to as radical empiricism.

  Philosophical skepticism originated in ancient Greek philosophy. One of its first proponents was Pyrrho of Elis , who traveled and studied as far as India, and propounded the adoption of practical skepticism. Subsequently, in the New Academy Arcesilaos and Carneades developed more theoretical perspectives, by which conceptions of absolute truth and falsity were refuted. Carneades criticized the views of the Dogmatists, especially supporters of Stoicism, asserting that absolute certainty of knowledge is impossible. Sextus Empiricus , the main authority for Greek skepticism, developed the position further, incorporating aspects of empiricism into the basis for asserting knowledge.

  Greek skeptics criticized the Stoics, accusing them of dogmatism. For the skeptics, the logical mode of argument was untenable, as it relied on propositions which could not be said to be either true or false without relying on further propositions. This was the regress argument, whereby every proposition must rely on other propositions in order to maintain its validity. In addition, the skeptics argued that two propositions could not rely on each other, as this would create a circular argument . For the skeptics such logic was thus an inadequate measure of truth which could create as many problems as it claimed to have solved. Truth was not, however, necessarily unobtainable, but rather an idea which did not yet exist in a pure form. Although skepticism was accused of denying the possibility of truth, in actual fact it appears to have mainly been a critical school which merely claimed that logicians had not discovered truth.

  Scientific skepticism

  A scientific skeptic is one who questions the reliability of certain kinds of claims by subjecting them to a systematic investigation. The scientific method details the specific process by which this investigation of reality is conducted. Considering the rigor of the scientific method, science itself may simply be thought of as an organized form skepticism. This does not mean that the scientific skeptic is necessarily a scientist who conducts live experiments , but that the skeptic generally accepts claims that are in his/her view likely to be true based on testable hypotheses and critical thinking.

  Common topics that scientifically-skeptical literature questions include health claims surrounding certain foods, procedures, and medicines, such as homeopathy, Reiki, Thought Field Therapy , vertebral subluxations; the plausibility of supernatural entities ; as well as the existence of ESP/telekinesis, psychic powers, and telepathy ; topics in cryptozoology, Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, UFOs, crop circles, astrology, repressed memories, creationism, dowsing, conspiracy theories, and other claims the skeptic sees as unlikely to be true on scientific grounds.

  Most empirical or scientific skeptics do not profess philosophical skepticism. Whereas a philosophical skeptic may deny the very existence of knowledge, an empirical skeptic merely seeks likely proof before accepting that knowledge.

  

主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美成人精品免费播放 | 国产69精品久久久久999小说 | 国产一级视频在线观看网站 | 日韩午夜精品免费理论片 | 久久国产免费观看精品3 | 99热久久免费精品首页 | 大学生疯狂高潮呻吟免费视频 | 国产三区二区 | 午夜污片 | 成人快色 | 中国一级毛片免费看视频 | 免费黄动漫网站 | 牛牛本精品99久久精品88m | 无码人妻一区二区三区免费视频 | 亚洲免费在线视频观看 | 亚洲综合久久久久久中文字幕 | 武则天一级毛片 | 曰韩美女一级视频 | 中文字幕天天躁日日躁狠狠躁免费 | 亚洲国产午夜精品理论片 | 少妇被躁爽到高潮 | 香港曰本韩国三级网站 | 亚洲精品综合欧美一区二区三区 | 粗大的内捧猛烈进出在线视频 | 91一区二区三区四区五区 | 亚洲av无码一区二区二三区∝ | 天堂成人在线 | 人妻夜夜爽天天爽欧美色院 | 日韩精品内射视频免费观看 | 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站 | 精品视频一区二区三三区四区 | 国产成人无码aa精品一区 | a色在线| 国产av国片偷人妻麻豆 | 免费看欧美一级特黄a大片 免费看欧美一级特黄a大片一 | 久久夜色精品国产嚕嚕亚洲av | 亚洲精品专区 | 亚洲成a人片在线观看尤物 亚洲成a人片在线观看中 | 亚洲国产成人久久一区www | 欧美视频久久久 | 黄色三级在线观看 |